Mortgage Protection - A Safety Net
Private insurance is seen as a safety net if problems arise due to the risk of unemployment, debts, repossession and the possibility of illness.If someone has a 100,000 pound mortgage, an increase of ten to twelve pounds a month would provide cover for the insured for the interest per month paid on the mortgage, should they run into problems.
With personal debt now totaling over a trillion pounds, the Government is pushing these new initiatives on private insurance.Bankruptcy is increasing and home owners are coming under pressure if they miss repayments on their mortgages.The possibility of repossession is worrying and frightening.
It's ironic when you realize that the taxpayer has coughed up some 8 billion pounds in benefits over the last 10 years in mortgage interest payments to support the unemployed.The treasury is now trying to off-load this onto to the responsibility of public and mortgage lenders.
Insisting that compulsory Mortgage Payment Protection Insurance (MPPI) should be enforced would not be a popular move as it increases costs when buying a house, and some experts are of the opinion that the Government should impose that expense onto the lenders, to come from their profits.It is no secret that building societies and banks make massive profits on selling MPPI and premiums are currently around 800 million to 1 billion yearly despite only just under a quarter of buyers having made the purchase.With the profit on this being 250 to 500 million pounds, you can follow the Governments way of thinking.
What the Government realizes is that 75 per cent of homeowners are left without protection if they fall on hard times.It's true that the benefits system is in place and gives support via Income Support for Mortgage Interest, but there are limitations on claimants.
The advice from the Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML), the voice for banks and building societies, is for first-time buyers to take out insurance to protect their homes.However, they are strongly against making MPPI a compulsory product, especially if it increases the buyer's outgoings.
The CML believe that if the industry has to absorb this cost then the outcome will be that mortgages will go up as this money will have to come from somewhere.Even if it is not seen as a separate premium, it will be built in and will increase the overall cost.In their opinion margins have been squeezed for some time now and it is making it impossible for firms to absorb this extra too.
The CML think that people should be free to make their own choices and arrangements with regard to this insurance, which may not be appropriate for everyone.It could be that people may have sufficient protection from other insurance, or through their employers or possibly substantial savings.In this case it would be unreasonable to enforce someone over insure.
Iain MacQueen-Sims, credit and debt expert of Omnichek, does not agree with the CML His opinion is that by making MPPI compulsory it would create a safety net and that it shouldn't add to homeowners costs.The lenders can easily fund it without any price increases and they should show some loyalty to a market where they do very well out of their customers.
A draft of the European Directive on the mortgage market is in favour of compulsory MPPI in all member states as a standard procedure.A spokesman for the Department of Work and Pensions has stated that "anyone taking out a mortgage should think hard about protecting their income."
About the Author
Interested in getting a quote on Mortgage insurance?
Please Visit Understand-Mortgages for more information and other resources.Our sister site Brokers Online offers cutting edge articles and information about Mortgage Insurance and other financial products.
Relaited Links:
- The Best Source for Wholesale Video Games Lead Generation: Explained!
- Open Market Homebuy; A Life Line or a Straight Jacket
- Life Insurance Needn't Break The Bank
Labels: argent business manager, ebay affiliate, harvard business review, segment marketing, wholesale merchandising